Which ethical theory suggests there is no absolute right or wrong?

Relativism is the ethical theory that posits that moral judgments and beliefs are not universally applicable but rather depend on individual or cultural perspectives. This means that what is considered right or wrong can vary significantly across different societies or within individuals, indicating that there are no absolute moral truths.

In contrast, deontology is founded on the belief that actions are inherently right or wrong based on established rules or duties, asserting that certain principles must always be followed regardless of the consequences. Utilitarianism focuses on the outcomes of actions, asserting that the most ethical choice is the one that results in the greatest good for the greatest number, which implies that there can be a definitive measure of rightness based on utility. Virtue ethics emphasizes the importance of character and moral virtues rather than rules or consequences, aiming for a good life through the cultivation of virtuous traits.

The understanding of relativism highlights the complexity of moral reasoning and the significant influence of context on ethical decision-making, making it a distinct perspective within ethical theory that contrasts with other normative ethical frameworks.